Ellis Silver Co. v. United States

Customs and Patent Appeals

Ellis Silver Co. v. United States

477 F.2d 946

CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 1973

DocketCustoms Appeal No. 5494

StatusPublished

This text of 477 F.2d 946 (Ellis Silver Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ellis Silver Co. v. United States, 477 F.2d 946 (ccpa 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division, Appellate Term, 67 Cust.Ct. 564, A.R.D. 293 (1971), affirming the decision and judgment of the single judge, 63 Cust.Ct. 647, R.D. 11688, 308 F.Supp. 704 (1969), in a reappraisement proceeding involving the proper dutiable value of certain silverplated hollowware exported from England. Appraisement on the basis of constructed value under section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, was sustained on the ground that appellant had failed to establish that the prices paid fairly reflected market value of the goods and thus had not proven the correctness of the claimed basis of export value under section 402(b), as amended.

Finding no reversible error below, we affirm the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Customs Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division, Appellate Term, 67 Cust.Ct. 564, A.R.D. 293 (1971), affirming the decision and judgment of the single judge, 63 Cust.Ct. 647, R.D. 11688, 308 F.Supp. 704 (1969), in a reappraisement proceeding involving the proper dutiable value of certain silverplated hollowware exported from England. Appraisement on the basis of constructed value under section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, was sustained on the ground that appellant had failed to establish that the prices paid fairly reflected market value of the goods and thus had not proven the correctness of the claimed basis of export value under section 402(b), as amended.

Finding no reversible error below, we affirm the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Customs Court.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 F.2d 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-silver-co-v-united-states-ccpa-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack