ELLIOTT v. WETZEL
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH ELLIOT, : : Petitioner : : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2076 : JOHN WETZEL, et al., : : Respondent. :
ORDER
This 19th day of March, 2021, upon careful and independent consideration of the Amended Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed by Petitioner, Joseph Elliot, (ECF 12), the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, dated June 15, 2020, (ECF 51), and Petitioner's Objection to the Report and Recommendation, (ECF 57), and for the additional reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice; 3. A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate the propriety of this Court's disposition of Petitioner’s claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and 4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ELLIOTT v. WETZEL (ELLIOTT v. WETZEL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.