Elliott v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Elliott v. State

962 S.W.2d 815, 332 Ark. 615, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 232

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedApril 16, 1998

DocketCR 98-373

StatusPublished

This text of 962 S.W.2d 815 (Elliott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elliott v. State, 962 S.W.2d 815, 332 Ark. 615, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 232 (Ark. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Nathan Elliott, by his attorney, Bruce J. Bennett, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Bennett admits in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Accordingly, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Nathan Elliott, by his attorney, Bruce J. Bennett, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Bennett admits in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Accordingly, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

962 S.W.2d 815, 332 Ark. 615, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elliott-v-state-ark-1998.