Elliott v. Laurens

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 583
Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided March 18, 1771·Published

Opinion

Upon Motion of Mr. Parsons of Counsel for the Complainants suggesting that the Defendants have filed their Answers to the Bill to revive and Answer filed against them by the Complainants as legal Representatives of Champernown Williamson It is Ordered that the Suit and Proceedings in the Cause of Champernown Williamson against the Defendants do stand revived and that the Complainants have the Benefit thereof.

William Burrows Master in Chancery

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott v. Laurens, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 583 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1771).

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 583 (Elliott v. Laurens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.