Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 745 F.3d 1269
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2013·No. 10-15152·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL; No. 10-15152 REGINALD ENTO; JEFFREY PATRICK LYONS, JR.; AAKASH DESAI, on D.C. No. behalf of themselves and others 3:09-cv-04779- similarly situated, CRB Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. ORDER

KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General; EVA STEINBERGER, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs, California Department of Justice, Defendants-Appellees.

Filed August 14, 2013

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

In light of Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. ___ , No. 12-207 (June 3, 2013) and the parties’ supplemental briefs, this case will be re-argued before the en banc court during the week of December 9, 2013, in San Francisco, California. The date and time will be determined by separate order. For further information or special requests regarding 2 HASKELL V. HARRIS

scheduling, please contact Deputy Clerk Paul Keller at paul_keller@ca9.uscourts.gov or (415) 355-8026.

The court grants leave pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 29(a) to any amicus wishing to file a brief bearing on the issues to be re-argued, so long as it is filed no later than October 28, 2013, and does not exceed 2,500 words.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris, (9th Cir. 2013).

Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris (Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.