Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris
686 F.3d 1121, 2012 WL 3038593, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15378
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2012·No. 10-15152·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Nguyen, Watford and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris, 686 F.3d 1121, 2012 WL 3038593, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15378 (9th Cir. 2012).
686 F.3d 1121 (Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr.
720 F.3d 1137 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Earl Davis
690 F.3d 226 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)
Maryland v. King
Supreme Court, 2012