Elisha Thomas, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Elisha Thomas, Jr. v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 30, 2014

Docket14-0487

StatusPublished

This text of Elisha Thomas, Jr. v. State of Florida (Elisha Thomas, Jr. v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elisha Thomas, Jr. v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

ELISHA THOMAS, JR., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-0487

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed July 22, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Elisha Thomas, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The portion of the petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel a ruling on

petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole

Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). The portion of the petition seeking to

compel a ruling on petitioner’s petition for nisi decree is also denied. See Sapp v.

Crosby, 917 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“Because the circuit court has nothing

before it on which to rule, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.”).

THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI