Eliason v. Herman

99 N.W. 1132, 92 Minn. 10, 1904 Minn. LEXIS 464

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only question presented for consideration in this case is whether the evidence is sufficient to justify the verdict. No exceptions were taken on the trial in the court below, and no errors in law are urged or relied upon. Our examination of the evidence leads to the conclusion that it is not so clearly and palpably against the verdict as to justify a reversal, and the order appealed from is affirmed.