Eliasberg v. Standard Oil Co.
This text of 97 A.2d 437 (Eliasberg v. Standard Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JAY ELIASBERG, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
STANDARD OIL COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Nathan H. Gates of the New York bar argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Osborne, Cornish & Scheck, attorneys; Mr. Emanuel P. Scheck, Mr. Stanley L. Kaufman of the New York bar and Mr. Joshua Peterfreund of the New York bar, on the brief).
Mr. Josiah Stryker argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Horner, attorneys; Mr. John W. Davis of the New York bar, Mr. George A. Brownell of the New York bar and Mr. Stuart Marks of the New York bar, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Freund in the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 A.2d 437, 12 N.J. 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eliasberg-v-standard-oil-co-nj-1953.