Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. Gibson
This text of 355 U.S. 897 (Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Memorandum of
Although the Court has definitively decided that a denial of a petition for certiorari carries no legal significance, Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443, 489-497, the bar, in briefs, and lower courts, in their opinions, continue to note such denials by way of reinforcing the authority of cited lower court decisions. It has therefore seemed to me appropriate from time to time to emphasize through concrete illustrations that a denial of certiorari does not imply approval of the decision for which review is sought or of its supporting opinion. This case presents another instance for underlining this nonsignificance of the denial of certiorari. Not until this Court explicitly holds that “in F. E. L. A. cases, speculation, conjecture and possibilities suffice to support a jury verdict,” which is the holding of the Court of Appeals in this case, 246 F. 2d 834, 837, is that to be assumed to be the law of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 U.S. 897, 78 S. Ct. 270, 2 L. Ed. 2d 193, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elgin-joliet-eastern-railway-co-v-gibson-scotus-1957.