Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu
307 U.S. 613
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu. Read the opinion of the Court — 307 U.S. 5 →
Opinion
The opinion is amended by striking out the word “them” at the end of the first full paragraph on page 11, and substituting “the claims in suit”; and by striking out the words “invalidity of” in the next to the last line of the opinion and substituting therefor the words “dismissal as to.” The petitions for rehearing are denied.
Reported as amended, ante, p. 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu, 307 U.S. 613 (1939).
307 U.S. 613 (Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.