Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu

307 U.S. 616
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu. Read the opinion of the Court — 307 U.S. 5
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 5, 1939·No. No. 441·Published

Opinion

Motion of the respondents for leave to file a second petition for modification of the decision and judgment of this Court and for recall and modification of its mandate granted. The opinion is amended by [617]*617striking out of the second full paragraph on page 12, in the first line, the word “that” and the words “is invalid,” and inserting, after the word “decision,” the words '“as to.” In other respects the petition is denied.

Reported as amended, ante, p. 5; see also, ante, p. 613.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu, 307 U.S. 616 (1939).

307 U.S. 616 (Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.