Elam v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Elam v. State

323 S.W.3d 835, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1483, 2010 WL 4282722

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 2, 2010

DocketWD 71413

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 323 S.W.3d 835 (Elam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elam v. State, 323 S.W.3d 835, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1483, 2010 WL 4282722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

This is an ineffective assistance of counsel case. The appellant argues that his attorneys were ineffective in that they failed to (1) object to a victim’s in-court identification of the defendant; (2) raise as an appellate issue that a photographic line *836 up used by the police was unduly suggestive; (3) cross-examine certain witnesses on their allegedly inconsistent and/or incomplete statements; and (4) interview and call a certain other witness. We hold that the appellant received competent assistance from his attorneys. Therefore, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

This is an ineffective assistance of counsel case. The appellant argues that his attorneys were ineffective in that they failed to (1) object to a victim’s in-court identification of the defendant; (2) raise as an appellate issue that a photographic line *836 up used by the police was unduly suggestive; (3) cross-examine certain witnesses on their allegedly inconsistent and/or incomplete statements; and (4) interview and call a certain other witness. We hold that the appellant received competent assistance from his attorneys. Therefore, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

323 S.W.3d 835, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1483, 2010 WL 4282722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elam-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack