Elam v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Elam v. State

254 S.W.3d 50, 2008 WL 65172

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 8, 2008

DocketWD 67298

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 S.W.3d 50 (Elam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Elam v. State, 254 S.W.3d 50, 2008 WL 65172 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

254 S.W.3d 50 (2008)

Gerald ELAM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 67298.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

January 8, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied March 4, 2008. Application for Transfer Denied June 24, 2008.

Mark Grothoff, Columbia for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang, Karen Kramer, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before VICTOR C. HOWARD, Chief Judge, PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 4, 2008.

ORDER

Gerald Elam appeals the circuit court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

254 S.W.3d 50 (2008)

Gerald ELAM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 67298.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

January 8, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied March 4, 2008. Application for Transfer Denied June 24, 2008.

Mark Grothoff, Columbia for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang, Karen Kramer, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before VICTOR C. HOWARD, Chief Judge, PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 4, 2008.

ORDER

Gerald Elam appeals the circuit court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 S.W.3d 50, 2008 WL 65172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elam-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Gerald ELAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ORDER

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Gerald ELAM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.