El v. Max Daetwyler Corp.
This text of 451 F. App'x 257 (El v. Max Daetwyler Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Darryl El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El v. Max Daetwyler Corp., No. 3:09-cv-00415-MOC-DCK, 2011 WL 1769805 (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
451 F. App'x 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/el-v-max-daetwyler-corp-ca4-2011.