El Paso Sash & Door Co. v. Carraway

245 U.S. 643, 38 S. Ct. 222, 62 L. Ed. 528, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1655
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 4, 1918·No. No. 369·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCorquodole v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, 437; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 118; Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589; St. Louis & San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240, 241; (2) Miller v. Cornwall R. R. Co., 168 U. S. 131, 134; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 84 et seq.; Bowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 664, 665.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

El Paso Sash & Door Co. v. Carraway, 245 U.S. 643, 38 S. Ct. 222, 62 L. Ed. 528, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1655 (1918).

245 U.S. 643 (El Paso Sash & Door Co. v. Carraway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanger v. New York
251 U.S. 537 (Supreme Court, 1919)
O'Brien v. Public Service Commission
251 U.S. 537 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Todd Protectograph Co. v. Hedman Mfg. Co.
254 F. 829 (N.D. Illinois, 1919)
Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.
248 U.S. 334 (Supreme Court, 1919)