E.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services

2 So. 3d 1067, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 759, 2009 WL 249228
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 2009
Docket3D08-1931
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 So. 3d 1067 (E.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 2 So. 3d 1067, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 759, 2009 WL 249228 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

E.K. appeals a final order placing his minor child in a permanent guardianship and terminating protective supervision, alleging error in the order’s visitation provision. We affirm and remand.

The trial court orally directed that E.K. and the custodian work out a visitation arrangement. However, the written order states that visitation shall be at the discretion of the custodian. The written order *1068 should be corrected to reflect the oral pronouncement. See B.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 864 So.2d 486, 488 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Accordingly, we affirm the final order, but we remand to the trial court and direct the trial court to correct the written order to conform to the oral pronouncement.

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A.M. v. Department of Children & Families
140 So. 3d 696 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Dunn v. State
2 So. 3d 1067 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 So. 3d 1067, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 759, 2009 WL 249228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ek-v-department-of-children-family-services-fladistctapp-2009.