A.M. v. Department of Children & Families

140 So. 3d 696, 2014 WL 2609348, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8929
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in A.M. v. Department of Children & Families. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12964
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 2014·No. No. 3D14-300·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A.M., the mother of A.J., a minor, seeks review of the trial court’s Revised Adjudication Order as to the Mother. We affirm the trial court’s adjudication of dependency as orally pronounced at the September 30, 2013, hearing, finding the child dependent as to A.M. pursuant to section 39.01(15)(g), Florida Statutes (2013).

As noted by the parties, however, the order does not comport with the oral pronouncement. The pertinent written finding is limited to a determination that the Mother has “emotional or mental health problems.” We remand the case so that the order can be amended to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement1 that A.J. does not have a parent that can control the further continued sexual exploitation of A.J.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A.M. v. Department of Children & Families, 140 So. 3d 696, 2014 WL 2609348, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8929 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

140 So. 3d 696 (A.M. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services
2 So. 3d 1067 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)