A.M. v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.M. v. Department of Children & Families

140 So. 3d 696, 2014 WL 2609348, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8929

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 2014

DocketNo. 3D14-300

StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 3d 696 (A.M. v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.M. v. Department of Children & Families, 140 So. 3d 696, 2014 WL 2609348, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8929 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A.M., the mother of A.J., a minor, seeks review of the trial court’s Revised Adjudication Order as to the Mother. We affirm the trial court’s adjudication of dependency as orally pronounced at the September 30, 2013, hearing, finding the child dependent as to A.M. pursuant to section 39.01(15)(g), Florida Statutes (2013).

As noted by the parties, however, the order does not comport with the oral pronouncement. The pertinent written finding is limited to a determination that the Mother has “emotional or mental health problems.” We remand the case so that the order can be amended to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement¹ that A.J. does not have a parent that can control the further continued sexual exploitation of A.J.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A.M., the mother of A.J., a minor, seeks review of the trial court’s Revised Adjudication Order as to the Mother. We affirm the trial court’s adjudication of dependency as orally pronounced at the September 30, 2013, hearing, finding the child dependent as to A.M. pursuant to section 39.01(15)(g), Florida Statutes (2013).

As noted by the parties, however, the order does not comport with the oral pronouncement. The pertinent written finding is limited to a determination that the Mother has “emotional or mental health problems.” We remand the case so that the order can be amended to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement¹ that A.J. does not have a parent that can control the further continued sexual exploitation of A.J.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 So. 3d 696, 2014 WL 2609348, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/am-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack