Eisenberg v. McDonnell

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

June 15, 1994
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________

No. 93-1021 

                                 DAVID W. EISENBERG,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              ROBERT MCDONNELL, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

                     [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                               Torruella, Cyr and Stahl,
                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________

                                 ____________________

            David W. Eisenberg on brief pro se.
            __________________

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam.  The orders of  the district court that
                      __________

            are  the subject  of this  appeal  are affirmed.   Plaintiff-
                                                   ________

            appellant  David  Eisenberg's  brief  offers  no  argument in

            support of this appeal, instead raising irrelevant challenges

            to this court's  actions in prior appeals  filed by him.   In

            any event, we see no error in the district court's orders.