Eisenberg v. McDonnell

27 F.3d 554, 1994 WL 266570
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided June 17, 1994·No. 93-1021·Unpublished

Opinion

27 F.3d 554

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
David W. EISENBERG, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Robert MCDONNELL, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 93-1021

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

June 15, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge ]

David W. Eisenberg on brief pro se.

D.Mass.

AFFIRMED.

Before Torruella, Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

The orders of the district court that are the subject of this appeal are affirmed. Plaintiff- appellant David Eisenberg's brief offers no argument in support of this appeal, instead raising irrelevant challenges to this court's actions in prior appeals filed by him. In any event, we see no error in the district court's orders.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eisenberg v. McDonnell, 27 F.3d 554, 1994 WL 266570 (1st Cir. 1994).

27 F.3d 554 (Eisenberg v. McDonnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.