Eidler v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

N.D. California

Eidler v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.

DecidedApril 22, 2021

Docket4:17-cv-03962

StatusUnknown

This text of Eidler v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (Eidler v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eidler v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 STACIA STINER, et al., Case No. 17-cv-03962-HSG (LB) 12 Plaintifts, Re: ECF No. 233 13 V. © 14 BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., et 5 15 te Defendants. a 16 = 17 The parties dispute the scope of the plaintiffs’ Rule 30(b)(6) depositions that they scheduled 18 || for this month in anticipation of the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. (Letter Brief — ECF 19 || No. 233.) The court held a hearing on April 22, 2021. The court allows five days of depositions on 20 || the topics designated by the plaintiffs in the letter brief. at 3.) The case is complex and 21 sprawling. Courts allow more extensive Rule 30(b) depositions on complex cases akin to this one. 22 || See, e.g., Lopez v. S.F. Unified Sch. Dist., No. C 99-00230 SI, 2004 WL 6065998, at *3—4 (N.D. 23 || Cal. Mar. 4, 2004). 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: April 22, 2021 Lit EC 26 7 LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 STACIA STINER, et al., Case No. 17-cv-03962-HSG (LB) 12 Plaintifts, Re: ECF No. 233 13 V. © 14 BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., et 5 15 te Defendants. a 16 = 17 The parties dispute the scope of the plaintiffs’ Rule 30(b)(6) depositions that they scheduled 18 || for this month in anticipation of the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. (Letter Brief — ECF 19 || No. 233.) The court held a hearing on April 22, 2021. The court allows five days of depositions on 20 || the topics designated by the plaintiffs in the letter brief. at 3.) The case is complex and 21 sprawling. Courts allow more extensive Rule 30(b) depositions on complex cases akin to this one. 22 || See, e.g., Lopez v. S.F. Unified Sch. Dist., No. C 99-00230 SI, 2004 WL 6065998, at *3—4 (N.D. 23 || Cal. Mar. 4, 2004). 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: April 22, 2021 Lit EC 26 7 LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Eidler v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eidler-v-brookdale-senior-living-inc-cand-2021.