Ehmke v. State

86 So. 3d 591, 2012 WL 1440558, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6626
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 2012
DocketNo. 5D11-2216
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 86 So. 3d 591 (Ehmke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ehmke v. State, 86 So. 3d 591, 2012 WL 1440558, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6626 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Melton v. State, 75 So.2d 291, 294 (Fla.1954) (explaining the “elements” of an arrest); see also State v. K.N., 66 So.3d 380, 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (“[An] officer may detain [an] individual ... with handcuffs for the officer’s [592]*592safety without converting [a] Terry stop into a formal arrest.”).

SAWAYA, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jahquell Davis v. State
253 So. 3d 1234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 So. 3d 591, 2012 WL 1440558, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ehmke-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.