Egressy v. Stansbury

86 P. 809, 149 Cal. 392, 1906 Cal. LEXIS 260
California Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 1906·No. L.A. No. 1873.·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

The motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal in the above entitled cause is granted. The time for the filing of the appellant's points and authorities expired long before the eighteenth day of April, 1906. No points and authorities had been filed up to the seventh day of May last, and on that day the motion to dismiss the appeal was filed in this court. The act of the governor in proclaiming legal holidays beginning with the 19th of April last could have no effect whatever upon the right of the appellant to file his points and authorities in a case such as this, where his time had expired before any holidays were proclaimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Egressy v. Stansbury, 86 P. 809, 149 Cal. 392, 1906 Cal. LEXIS 260 (Cal. 1906).

86 P. 809 (Egressy v. Stansbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burnett v. San Francisco Police Department
36 Cal. App. 4th 1177 (California Court of Appeal, 1995)
Smith v. Smith
447 N.W.2d 715 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1989)
Bayes v. Nancy C.
28 Cal. App. 3d 747 (California Court of Appeal, 1972)
Ames v. City of Hermosa Beach
16 Cal. App. 3d 146 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
Phillips v. Board of Police Commissioners
240 Cal. App. 2d 410 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)
People v. Walton
161 P.2d 498 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
People v. Walton
70 Cal. App. 2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1945)
Burk v. Montana Power Co.
255 P. 337 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
Berendsen v. Babdaty
216 P. 385 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
State v. Rose
51 So. 496 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)