Eger v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eger v. City of New York

206 A.D. 718

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1923

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 A.D. 718 (Eger v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eger v. City of New York, 206 A.D. 718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, because of error in the charge of the trial court at folios 394, 395, and the refusal to charge at folios 398-400. (Vanderborg v. City of New York, 158 App. Div. 297.) Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., dissents upon the ground that a question of fact was presented as to defendant’s negligence. (Moshier v. City of New York, 190 App. Div. 111, and cases cited.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the law, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, because of error in the charge of the trial court at folios 394, 395, and the refusal to charge at folios 398-400. (Vanderborg v. City of New York, 158 App. Div. 297.) Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., dissents upon the ground that a question of fact was presented as to defendant’s negligence. (Moshier v. City of New York, 190 App. Div. 111, and cases cited.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D. 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eger-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack