Edwin Monroe Browning v. United States
This text of 218 F.2d 821 (Edwin Monroe Browning v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Edwin Monroe BROWNING, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Misc. No. 410.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 18, 1955.
Edwin M. Browning in pro. per.
No appearance for respondent.
Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted of auto theft in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, and has sought relief from that judgment. He has been denied a new trial, a writ of mandate, and his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 has been denied.
His application to appeal forma pauperis was denied by the lower court which certified the appeal was not taken in good faith. He now petitions this court to review these decisions forma pauperis. The petition is dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 F.2d 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwin-monroe-browning-v-united-states-ca9-1955.