Browning v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Browning v. United States

218 F.2d 821

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 18, 1955·No. Misc. No. 410·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of auto theft in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, and has sought relief from that judgment. He has been denied a new trial, a writ of mandate, and his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 has been denied.

His application to appeal forma pau-peris was denied by the lower court which certified the appeal was not taken in good faith. He now petitions this court to review these decisions forma pauperis. The petition is dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of auto theft in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, and has sought relief from that judgment. He has been denied a new trial, a writ of mandate, and his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 has been denied.

His application to appeal forma pau-peris was denied by the lower court which certified the appeal was not taken in good faith. He now petitions this court to review these decisions forma pauperis. The petition is dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Browning v. United States, 218 F.2d 821 (9th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

218 F.2d 821 (Browning v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related