Browning v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Browning v. United States

218 F.2d 821

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 18, 1955

DocketMisc. No. 410

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 F.2d 821 (Browning v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Browning v. United States, 218 F.2d 821 (9th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of auto theft in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, and has sought relief from that judgment. He has been denied a new trial, a writ of mandate, and his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 has been denied.

His application to appeal forma pau-peris was denied by the lower court which certified the appeal was not taken in good faith. He now petitions this court to review these decisions forma pauperis. The petition is dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of auto theft in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, and has sought relief from that judgment. He has been denied a new trial, a writ of mandate, and his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 has been denied.

His application to appeal forma pau-peris was denied by the lower court which certified the appeal was not taken in good faith. He now petitions this court to review these decisions forma pauperis. The petition is dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 F.2d 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/browning-v-united-states-ca9-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack