Edwin M. Sigel v. Aamer Razi

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 2013·No. 05-12-01451-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered March 27, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01451-CV

EDWIN SIGEL, Appellant

V.

AAMER RAZI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-15162

ORDER By letter filed March 18, 2013, the District Clerk informed us that the trial court’s

September 10, 2012 “summary judgment (no evidence) as to defendant Sigel’s second amended

counterclaim” cannot be located. Because that judgment is necessary for the determination of

our jurisdiction over this appeal, we ORDER the Honorable Carlos Cortez, Presiding Judge of

the 44th Judicial District Court, to determine, within twenty days of the date of this order, what

constitutes an accurate copy of that judgment and include it in a supplemental clerk’s record.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(e). We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to email a copy of this Order to the Honorable

Carlos Cortez and his court coordinator, Robyn Poston.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwin M. Sigel v. Aamer Razi, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Edwin M. Sigel v. Aamer Razi (Edwin M. Sigel v. Aamer Razi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.