Edwin M. Sigel v. Aamer Razi
This text of Edwin M. Sigel v. Aamer Razi (Edwin M. Sigel v. Aamer Razi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered March 27, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01451-CV
EDWIN SIGEL, Appellant
V.
AAMER RAZI, Appellee
On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-15162
ORDER By letter filed March 18, 2013, the District Clerk informed us that the trial court’s
September 10, 2012 “summary judgment (no evidence) as to defendant Sigel’s second amended
counterclaim” cannot be located. Because that judgment is necessary for the determination of
our jurisdiction over this appeal, we ORDER the Honorable Carlos Cortez, Presiding Judge of
the 44th Judicial District Court, to determine, within twenty days of the date of this order, what
constitutes an accurate copy of that judgment and include it in a supplemental clerk’s record.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(e). We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to email a copy of this Order to the Honorable
Carlos Cortez and his court coordinator, Robyn Poston.
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edwin M. Sigel v. Aamer Razi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwin-m-sigel-v-aamer-razi-texapp-2013.