Edwin Grant v. C.O. Thomas, Body Camera #9, et al.
This text of Edwin Grant v. C.O. Thomas, Body Camera #9, et al. (Edwin Grant v. C.O. Thomas, Body Camera #9, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDWIN GRANT, Plaintiff, 25-CV-4800 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL C.O. THOMAS, BODY CAMERA #9, ET AL., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated June 16, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed prisoner authorization or pay the $405.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed a prisoner authorization or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 13, 2025 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edwin Grant v. C.O. Thomas, Body Camera #9, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwin-grant-v-co-thomas-body-camera-9-et-al-nysd-2025.