Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 2012·No. 145829·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

November 20, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

145829 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly EDWIN A. NICHOLS, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 145829 COA: 303783 WCAC: 08-000024, 08-000050 HOWMET CORPORATION and PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY/ CIGNA, Defendants-Appellants, and

CORDANT TECHNOLOGIES and AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 1, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 20, 2012 _________________________________________ t1113 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation, (Mich. 2012).

Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation (Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.