Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation
This text of Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation (Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 28, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
150025(148) Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano EDWIN A. NICHOLS, Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
v SC: 150025 COA: 303783 WCAC: 08-000024 HOWMET CORPORATION and PACIFIC 08-000050 EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY/ CIGNA, Defendants-Appellees, and CORDANT TECHNOLOGIES and MICHIGAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY ASSOCIATION, Defendants-Appellants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 30, 2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 28, 2015 p0518 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwin-a-nichols-v-howmet-corporation-mich-2015.