Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 28, 2015·No. 150025·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 28, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

150025(148) Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

EDWIN A. NICHOLS, Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 150025 COA: 303783 WCAC: 08-000024

HOWMET CORPORATION and PACIFIC 08-000050 EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY/ CIGNA, Defendants-Appellees,

and CORDANT TECHNOLOGIES and MICHIGAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY ASSOCIATION, Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 30, 2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2015

p0518 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation, (Mich. 2015).

Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation (Edwin a Nichols v. Howmet Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.