Edwards v. Nemenyi

462 N.E.2d 124, 61 N.Y.2d 800, 473 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4077
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

opinion of the court

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Not only was there no proof identifying the defect in the stool, from which plaintiff fell, and establishing that such defect was the proximate cause of the fall, but there was no showing of “facts and conditions from which the negligence of the defendant and the causation of the accident by that negligence may be reasonably inferred” (Ingersoll v Liberty Bank, 278 NY 1,7; see Agnelli v Tonegatti, 20 AD2d 887).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye concur; Judge Simons taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. Nemenyi, 462 N.E.2d 124, 61 N.Y.2d 800, 473 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4077 (N.Y. 1984).

462 N.E.2d 124 (Edwards v. Nemenyi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Putnick v. H.M.C. Associates
137 A.D.2d 179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Covelli v. Long Island Lighting Co.
133 A.D.2d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)