Covelli v. Long Island Lighting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Covelli v. Long Island Lighting Co.

133 A.D.2d 605, 519 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51643

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 A.D.2d 605 (Covelli v. Long Island Lighting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Covelli v. Long Island Lighting Co., 133 A.D.2d 605, 519 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51643 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), entered March 21, 1986, as dismissed the first and third causes of action of the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs’ case.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The trial court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the causes of action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services. Although the plaintiffs did adduce sufficient proof to demonstrate that the defendant, a utility, breached the duty to them to exercise reasonable care in the maintenance of the power lines, there is no evidence in this record to establish that the defendant’s breach of its duty was a proximate cause of the plaintiffs’ alleged injuries (see, Francois v Commercial Hotel, 131 AD2d 540; Edwards v Nemenyi, 92 AD2d 785, affd 61 NY2d 800). Lawrence, J. P., Fiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), entered March 21, 1986, as dismissed the first and third causes of action of the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs’ case.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The trial court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the causes of action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services. Although the plaintiffs did adduce sufficient proof to demonstrate that the defendant, a utility, breached the duty to them to exercise reasonable care in the maintenance of the power lines, there is no evidence in this record to establish that the defendant’s breach of its duty was a proximate cause of the plaintiffs’ alleged injuries (see, Francois v Commercial Hotel, 131 AD2d 540; Edwards v Nemenyi, 92 AD2d 785, affd 61 NY2d 800). Lawrence, J. P., Fiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D.2d 605, 519 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/covelli-v-long-island-lighting-co-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack