Edwards v. Johnson's Hardware Supply Co., No. 562836 (Feb. 3, 2003)

Connecticut Superior Court

Edwards v. Johnson's Hardware Supply Co., No. 562836 (Feb. 3, 2003)

2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 1998

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedFebruary 3, 2003

DocketNo. 562836

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 1998 (Edwards v. Johnson's Hardware Supply Co., No. 562836 (Feb. 3, 2003)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edwards v. Johnson's Hardware Supply Co., No. 562836 (Feb. 3, 2003), 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 1998 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ARTICULATION The motion to strike count one was denied because plaintiff alleges a violation of C.G.S. § 46a-60 (a) (8) c which states that sexual harassment shall be defined as any conduct of a sexual nature where such conduct has the effect of substantially interfering with an individual's work performance, and that it shall be a discriminatory practice in violation of C.G.S. § 46a-60 (a) (1) for an employer or his agent to discharge from employment any individual. The defendant William Johnson was an agent of Johnson's Hardware and Supply Co., Inc. The plaintiff has alleged the required elements for a case of sexual harassment in count one.

The motion to strike count three was denied because the defendant's actions in terminating the plaintiff violated public policy and it was in retaliation for filing a criminal complaint against the person she claimed sexually assaulted her in violation of C.G.S. § 46a-60 (a) (4).

Since the defendant's conduct in firing the plaintiff was in violation of public policy as alleged in count three, the plaintiff has stated a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

D. Michael Hurley, JTR CT Page 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ARTICULATION The motion to strike count one was denied because plaintiff alleges a violation of C.G.S. § 46a-60 (a) (8) c which states that sexual harassment shall be defined as any conduct of a sexual nature where such conduct has the effect of substantially interfering with an individual's work performance, and that it shall be a discriminatory practice in violation of C.G.S. § 46a-60 (a) (1) for an employer or his agent to discharge from employment any individual. The defendant William Johnson was an agent of Johnson's Hardware and Supply Co., Inc. The plaintiff has alleged the required elements for a case of sexual harassment in count one.

The motion to strike count three was denied because the defendant's actions in terminating the plaintiff violated public policy and it was in retaliation for filing a criminal complaint against the person she claimed sexually assaulted her in violation of C.G.S. § 46a-60 (a) (4).

Since the defendant's conduct in firing the plaintiff was in violation of public policy as alleged in count three, the plaintiff has stated a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

D. Michael Hurley, JTR CT Page 1999

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 1998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-johnsons-hardware-supply-co-no-562836-feb-3-2003-connsuperct-2003.

Opinion

D. Michael Hurley, JTR CT Page 1999

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack