Edwards v. Fincher
This text of 176 S.E.2d 505 (Edwards v. Fincher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is a personal injury action for damages sustained in an automobile collision. The defensive pleadings on motion for summary judgment disclose the uncontradicted fact that the plaintiff signed a receipt acknowledging payment "in full settlement and release of any and all claims of property damage, heretofore sustained, or which may hereafter arise, in consequence of any accident which occurred on or about 2 December 1968.” The trial judge denied the motion and certified his ruling for appeal. Held:
We reverse. The sole question for review is whether the release, though pertaining only to property damage, bars a subsequent action for personal injuries resulting from the same tortious act. The Supreme Court answered the question in the affirmative in Gregory v. Schnurstein, 212 Ga. 497 (93 SE2d 680), and this court must follow this ruling.
The trial court therefore erred in refusing to grant summary judgment for the defendant.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 S.E.2d 505, 122 Ga. App. 176, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edwards-v-fincher-gactapp-1970.