Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security Benefit DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.

District Court, S.D. Texas·Decided March 22, 2023·No. 4:22-cv-00520·Unknown

Opinion

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 23, 2023 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION

VIOLA ERVETTE EDWARDS, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:22-CV-00520 § COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT, § § Defendant. § ORDER Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho’s Memorandum and Recommendation filed on March 6, 2023. Doc. #19. The deadline for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation for clear error. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation in its entirety. Therefore, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #12) is GRANTED, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #14) is DENIED, and the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s decision is VACATED. This matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with Judge Ho’s Memorandum and Recommendation. It isso ORDERED.

2:2: 2023 Date The Honorable\Mfred H. Bennett United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security Benefit DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED., (S.D. Tex. 2023).

Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security Benefit DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED. (Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security Benefit DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related