Edward Dawson v. State of Indiana

943 N.E.2d 1281, 2011 Ind. LEXIS 262, 2011 WL 1137057
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 29, 2011
Docket49S02-1103-CR-176
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 943 N.E.2d 1281 (Edward Dawson v. State of Indiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward Dawson v. State of Indiana, 943 N.E.2d 1281, 2011 Ind. LEXIS 262, 2011 WL 1137057 (Ind. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s final, appealable order revoking Dawson’s probation and ordering him to serve six years in the Department of Correction was entered in April 2009. Some eight months later, the trial court granted Dawson permission to file a belated notice of appeal pursuant to Post-Conviction Rule 2.

The rule allows belated appeals in certain criminal cases. 1 A threshold question in this appeal is whether Post-Conviction Rule 2 allows belated appeals from an order revoking probation. The Court of Appeals held that the rule did not apply and declined to consider Dawson’s appeal on the merits. Dawson v. State, 938 N.E.2d 841, 844-46 (Ind.Ct.App.2010).

The Court of Appeals correctly decided that belated appeals from orders revoking probation are not presently available pursuant to Post-Conviction Rule 2. We agree with the Court of Appeals’ analysis that the sanction imposed when probation is revoked does not qualify as a “sentence” under the Rule, and therefore Dawson is not an “eligible defendant.” Accordingly, we grant transfer and adopt and incorpo *1282 rate by reference the opinion of the Court of Appeals under Appellate Rule 58(A)(1),

SHEPARD, C.J., and DICKSON, SULLIVAN, RUCKER and DAVID, JJ., concur.
1

. As relevant to this case, Post-Conviction Rule 2 provides:

Eligible defendant defined. An “eligible defendant” for purposes of this Rule is a defendant who, but for the defendant’s failure to do so timely, would have the right to challenge on direct appeal a conviction or sentence after a trial or plea of guilty by filing a notice of appeal, filing a motion to correct error, or pursuing an appeal.
[[Image here]]
Section 1. Belated Notice of Appeal
(a) Required Showings. An eligible defendant convicted after a trial or plea of guilty may petition the trial court for permission to file a belated notice of appeal of the conviction or sentence if:
(1) the defendant failed to file a timely notice of appeal;
(2) the failure to file a timely notice of appeal was not due to the fault of the defendant; and
(3) the defendant has been diligent in requesting permission to file a belated notice of appeal under this rule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Travis S. Chandler v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2026
Dwayne Clemons v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2025
Martez James Sevion, Jr. v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2023
James D. Cummings v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2019
Derek Core v. State of Indiana
122 N.E.3d 974 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2019)
Derrian N. Hampton v. State of Indiana
71 N.E.3d 1165 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2017)
Amy Morinskey v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2017
Brandon Kincheloe v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2014
Douglas R. Bartel v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2013
Michael Warren v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2013
Bowling v. State
960 N.E.2d 837 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2012)
Jessica Bowling v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2012

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
943 N.E.2d 1281, 2011 Ind. LEXIS 262, 2011 WL 1137057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-dawson-v-state-of-indiana-ind-2011.