Edward C. Striffler, Inc. v. Commissioner

7 B.T.A. 887, 1927 BTA LEXIS 3082
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJuly 30, 1927
DocketDocket No. 5533.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 B.T.A. 887 (Edward C. Striffler, Inc. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edward C. Striffler, Inc. v. Commissioner, 7 B.T.A. 887, 1927 BTA LEXIS 3082 (bta 1927).

Opinion

[888]*888OPINION.

Maequette :

Edward C. Striffler acquired for $10,000 the good will of the business founded and operated by his father, and he was entitled to include in the invested capital of his business on account of said good will the amount of $10,000. When he sold his business to the petitioner in 1919 the value of the good will in question was still $10,000. He received therefor stock of the par value of more than $10,000. The lowest of the three limitations on the inclusion in invested capital of intangible assets acquired for stock is in this case the value of the intangibles, to wit, $10,000, and the petitioner is not prevented from including that amount in its invested capital by section 331 of the Bevenue Act of 1918, since it is not in excess of the amount at which Striffler was entitled to include it in the invested capital of his business.

Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Considered by Phillips, Yan Fossan, and Milliicen.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edward C. Striffler, Inc. v. Commissioner
7 B.T.A. 887 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 B.T.A. 887, 1927 BTA LEXIS 3082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edward-c-striffler-inc-v-commissioner-bta-1927.