Edrington v. Hubbart

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Edrington v. Hubbart

640 So. 2d 1224, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7901, 1994 WL 416996

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 9, 1994

DocketNo. 94-1712

StatusPublished

This text of 640 So. 2d 1224 (Edrington v. Hubbart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edrington v. Hubbart, 640 So. 2d 1224, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7901, 1994 WL 416996 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having concluded that Zoye Edrington’s petition for writ of mandamus should be treated as a direct appeal from the trial court’s Order Ratifying Report of General Master and Overruling Exceptions which modified custody of the minor child, we affirm the order. See Yurgel v. Yurgel, 572 So.2d 1327 (Fla.1990); Booker v. Booker, 636 So.2d 796 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Maliska v. Broome, 609 So.2d 711 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Steward v. Steward, 588 So.2d 692 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having concluded that Zoye Edrington’s petition for writ of mandamus should be treated as a direct appeal from the trial court’s Order Ratifying Report of General Master and Overruling Exceptions which modified custody of the minor child, we affirm the order. See Yurgel v. Yurgel, 572 So.2d 1327 (Fla.1990); Booker v. Booker, 636 So.2d 796 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Maliska v. Broome, 609 So.2d 711 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Steward v. Steward, 588 So.2d 692 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

640 So. 2d 1224, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7901, 1994 WL 416996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edrington-v-hubbart-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack