Edrington v. Hubbart

640 So. 2d 1224, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7901, 1994 WL 416996
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 1994·No. No. 94-1712·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having concluded that Zoye Edrington’s petition for writ of mandamus should be treated as a direct appeal from the trial court’s Order Ratifying Report of General Master and Overruling Exceptions which modified custody of the minor child, we affirm the order. See Yurgel v. Yurgel, 572 So.2d 1327 (Fla.1990); Booker v. Booker, 636 So.2d 796 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Maliska v. Broome, 609 So.2d 711 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Steward v. Steward, 588 So.2d 692 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edrington v. Hubbart, 640 So. 2d 1224, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7901, 1994 WL 416996 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

640 So. 2d 1224 (Edrington v. Hubbart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yurgel v. Yurgel
572 So. 2d 1327 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Steward v. Steward
588 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Booker v. Booker
636 So. 2d 796 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Maliska v. Broome
609 So. 2d 711 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)