Edmunds v. Edmunds
674 S.E.2d 679, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 175, 2009 WL 426070
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 13, 2009
Docket23A09
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 674 S.E.2d 679 (Edmunds v. Edmunds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Edmunds v. Edmunds, 674 S.E.2d 679, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 175, 2009 WL 426070 (N.C. 2009).
Opinion
EDMUNDS
v.
EDMUNDS.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Benton H. Walton, III, C. Martin Scott, II, Whiteville, for Edmunds & High.
Paul Ekster, Dennis Worley, Tabor City, for Donald Edmunds.
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of February 2009 by Defendants (Edmunds & High) for Extension of Time to File Brief:
"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Edmunds and High) shall have up to and including the 26th day of February 2009 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 13th day of February 2009."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Armstrong v. Knight
674 S.E.2d 679 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
674 S.E.2d 679, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 175, 2009 WL 426070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmunds-v-edmunds-nc-2009.