Edmund Zagorski v. Tony Mays

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Edmund Zagorski v. Tony Mays. Read the opinion of the Court — 907 F.3d 901
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 30, 2018·No. 18-6052·Published

Opinion

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0242p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

EDMUND ZAGORSKI, ┐ Petitioner-Appellant, │ │ > No. 18-6052 v. │ │ │ TONY MAYS, Warden, │ Respondent-Appellee. │ ┘

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville. No. 3:99-cv-01193—Aleta Arthur Trauger, District Judge.

Decided and Filed: October 30, 2018

Before: COLE, Chief Judge; COOK and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges. _________________

COUNSEL

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC AND ON MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION: Paul R. Bottei, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Nashville, Tennessee, for Appellant.

_________________

ORDER _________________

The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Chief Judge Cole would adhere to his original dissent. No. 18-6052 Zagorski v. Mays Page 2

The petition then was circulated to the full court. No judge has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Therefore, the petition is denied

Further, the motion for stay of execution is also denied.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edmund Zagorski v. Tony Mays, (6th Cir. 2018).

Edmund Zagorski v. Tony Mays (Edmund Zagorski v. Tony Mays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.