Edmonds v. Fresenius Medical Care
608 S.E.2d 755, 359 N.C. 313
Opinion
Elizabeth EDMONDS, Employee
v.
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE, Employer, Self-Insured (CNA Claim Plus, Servicing Agent).
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Randy D. Duncan, Hickory, for plaintiff-appellee.
Hedrick Eatman Gardner & Kincheloe, L.L.P., by Mel J. Garofalo and Shannon P. Herndon, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant Fresenius Medical Care.
*756 PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Edmonds v. Fresenius Medical Care, 608 S.E.2d 755, 359 N.C. 313 (N.C. 2005).
608 S.E.2d 755 (Edmonds v. Fresenius Medical Care) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hyatt v. N.C. Department of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2009
Zbytniuk v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc.
359 N.C. 857 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2005)