Edmonds v. Fresenius Medical Care
608 S.E.2d 755, 359 N.C. 313
This text of 608 S.E.2d 755 (Edmonds v. Fresenius Medical Care) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Edmonds v. Fresenius Medical Care, 608 S.E.2d 755, 359 N.C. 313 (N.C. 2005).
Opinion
Elizabeth EDMONDS, Employee
v.
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE, Employer, Self-Insured (CNA Claim Plus, Servicing Agent).
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Randy D. Duncan, Hickory, for plaintiff-appellee.
Hedrick Eatman Gardner & Kincheloe, L.L.P., by Mel J. Garofalo and Shannon P. Herndon, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant Fresenius Medical Care.
*756 PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hyatt v. N.C. Department of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2009
Zbytniuk v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc.
359 N.C. 857 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
608 S.E.2d 755, 359 N.C. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmonds-v-fresenius-medical-care-nc-2005.