Edmonds v. Corizon, LLC

District Court, E.D. Missouri·Decided January 12, 2021·No. 4:20-cv-00946·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION AKIRA EDMONDS, ) Plaintiff, . v. No. 4:20-CV-946 SNLJ CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, et al., : Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. ECF No. 12. When the Court dismissed this action, it certified in writing that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. See ECF Nos. 8 & 9; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). It is not apparent that plaintiff now seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). Asa result, the Court will deny the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 12] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Dated this (Ath day of January, 2021.

. STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH,YR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edmonds v. Corizon, LLC, (E.D. Mo. 2021).

Edmonds v. Corizon, LLC (Edmonds v. Corizon, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)