Edmond v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Edmond v. State

521 So. 2d 271, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 599, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 830, 1988 WL 17247

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 2, 1988

DocketNo. 86-2516

StatusPublished

This text of 521 So. 2d 271 (Edmond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edmond v. State, 521 So. 2d 271, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 599, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 830, 1988 WL 17247 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

This case is controlled by the opinion filed on this date in Edmond v. State, 521 So.2d 269 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). In the present case, Edmond was convicted of burglary and sexual battery, stemming from the events introduced as collateral crime evidence in case no. 86-2515. The sole issue dispositive of this appeal concerns the admissibility of evidence of a similar crime; the similar crime evidence introduced here was also the primary evidence leading to Edmond’s conviction in case no. 86-2515.

In accordance with our decision in case no. 86-2515, we reverse the judgment and sentences and remand for a new trial to be conducted without the admission of the collateral crime evidence.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARKER, Judge.

This case is controlled by the opinion filed on this date in Edmond v. State, 521 So.2d 269 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). In the present case, Edmond was convicted of burglary and sexual battery, stemming from the events introduced as collateral crime evidence in case no. 86-2515. The sole issue dispositive of this appeal concerns the admissibility of evidence of a similar crime; the similar crime evidence introduced here was also the primary evidence leading to Edmond’s conviction in case no. 86-2515.

In accordance with our decision in case no. 86-2515, we reverse the judgment and sentences and remand for a new trial to be conducted without the admission of the collateral crime evidence.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

521 So. 2d 271, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 599, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 830, 1988 WL 17247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edmond-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack