Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.
Opinion
It is found that the moneys paid by the People’s National Bank of Lebanon to the Horace E. Prick Company on the cheeks of that company were advanced [904]*904pursuant to agreements made in connection therewith, that bills receivable from the Edison Electric Illuminating Company of Brooklyn should be assigned to secure the payment thereof, and that assignments “A” to “ G” were ^thereafter made accordingly and notes given to evidence the loans, although the particular bills assigned were not designated at the time the loans were made. The transactions were not within the Stock Corporation Law (Laws of 1909, chap. 61, § 66),
Consol. Laws, chap. 59 (Laws of 1909, chap. 61), § 66; H. J. Laws of 1896, chap. 185, § 64; 2 Comp. Stat. H. J. 1638, § 64.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
160 A.D. 903 (Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.