Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.

158 A.D. 950

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 158 A.D. 950 (Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Horace E. Frick Co., 158 A.D. 950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified so as to charge the lienors found to be entitled to the fund with only one-half of the expenses of the reference, and judgment directed against the Hational Bank of Lebanon for the other half; and as so modified affirmed, without costs against the bank, but with one bill of costs and disbursements, except for printing the record, in favor of the Ajax Lead Coating Company, M. Goodwin & Co., Audley Clark Company and Heal & Brinker Company against John V. Lindberg and the Hational Bridge Works, and without costs against the H. Ryan Company. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Thomas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified so as to charge the lienors found to be entitled to the fund with only one-half of the expenses of the reference, and judgment directed against the Hational Bank of Lebanon for the other half; and as so modified affirmed, without costs against the bank, but with one bill of costs and disbursements, except for printing the record, in favor of the Ajax Lead Coating Company, M. Goodwin & Co., Audley Clark Company and Heal & Brinker Company against John V. Lindberg and the Hational Bridge Works, and without costs against the H. Ryan Company. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Thomas.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 A.D. 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edison-electric-illuminating-co-v-horace-e-frick-co-nyappdiv-1913.