Edgett v. North Fork Bank

72 A.D.3d 1635, 899 N.Y.S.2d 691
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 30, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 72 A.D.3d 1635 (Edgett v. North Fork Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edgett v. North Fork Bank, 72 A.D.3d 1635, 899 N.Y.S.2d 691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered February 17, 2009 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of third-party defendant North way Exchange Auto Auction to dismiss the third amended third-party complaint against it.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, third-party defendant Northway Exchange Auto Auction (Northway) appeals from an order that, inter alia, denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third amended third-party complaint against it. Supreme Court properly denied the motion, regardless of its merits, inasmuch as North way failed to provide in support of its motion a copy of all of the third-party pleadings (see CPLR 3212 [b]; D.J. Enters. of WNY v Benderson, 294 AD2d 825 [2002]).

We note in addition that, although defendant North Fork Bank (North Fork) purports to cross-appeal from those parts of the order denying its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the fourth amended complaint against it and for summary judgment on the third amended third-party complaint against Northway, that cross appeal was deemed dismissed nine months after the service of the notice of appeal based on North Fork’s failure to perfect it (see 22 NYCRR 1000.12 [b]). North Fork has not moved to vacate that dismissal (see 22 NYCRR 1000.13 [g]), and thus its requests for affirmative relief are not before us. Present — Martoche, J.P., Smith, Fahey, Peradotto and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amber Well Drilling, LLC v. Reed
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
JACOBSON, JULIE W. v. WILKINSON, KEITH H.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Jacobson v. Wilkinson
128 A.D.3d 1335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
HECKL, RACHEL v. WALSH, DANIEL M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Heckl v. Walsh
122 A.D.3d 1252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
KARAM, PATRICIA v. ADIRONDACK NEUROSURGICAL SPECIALIST
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Karam v. Adirondack Neurosurgical Specialists, P.C.
117 A.D.3d 1472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Singh v. Brown
43 Misc. 3d 715 (New York Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A.D.3d 1635, 899 N.Y.S.2d 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgett-v-north-fork-bank-nyappdiv-2010.