Edgar-Morgan Co. v. Anderson
This text of 23 F.2d 896 (Edgar-Morgan Co. v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Edgar-Morgan Company, filed a petition for the cancellation of the trade-mark “Creamo” placed above a circle in which appears the head of a mule. The mark is used on oats for use .as stock feed. The petitioner claims damage through prior use upon stock feed of a mark which consists of the words “Old Beck” and a red disk underneath, upon which appears the head of a mule.
No testimony was taken by the appellee; hence the earliest date to which he is entitled is his filing date, February 10, 1923. The testimony of petitioner shows that his mark has been employed by stamping it upon burlap bags in which the feed is packed, and on which appears the large red disk with a mule’s head prominently displayed, and above the disk the words “Old Beck.” While the position of the mule’s head is slightly different in each case, it is set forth as a silhouette, and the difference is so slight that it would not he observed by the ordinary person. The only difference, therefore, between the marks, are tke words “Creamo” in the one instance, and “Old Beck” in the other.
Cancellation was ordered by the Examiner of Interferences, and his decision was reversed by the Commissioner. We think the decision of the Examiner was right. While it is true that pictures of stock used in connection with stock feed are descriptive, the registrant in this case, as pointed out by the Examiner, “has not distinguished its mark from that used by the petitioner, as is required of traders using descriptive elements of another’s mark.”
The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F.2d 896, 57 App. D.C. 359, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edgar-morgan-co-v-anderson-cadc-1927.