Edenwald Contracting Co. v. Northern Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Edenwald Contracting Co. v. Northern Insurance

289 A.D.2d 370, 734 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12144

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 289 A.D.2d 370 (Edenwald Contracting Co. v. Northern Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Edenwald Contracting Co. v. Northern Insurance, 289 A.D.2d 370, 734 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for unfair trade practices, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated January 23, 2001, as granted the motion by the third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action in the third-party complaint seeking common-law indemnification and denied its cross motion for summary judgment on that cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The cause of action of the defendant third-party plaintiff, City Underwriting Agency, Inc. (hereinafter City), for common-law indemnification was properly dismissed. The record demonstrates that City was not free of negligence because it issued insurance binders with incorrect information (see, Kagan v Jacobs, 260 AD2d 442; see also, Henderson v Waldbaums, 149 AD2d 461; County of Westchester v Becket Assocs., 102 AD2d 34, affd 66 NY2d 642). Krausman, J. P., Luciano, Feuerstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for unfair trade practices, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated January 23, 2001, as granted the motion by the third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action in the third-party complaint seeking common-law indemnification and denied its cross motion for summary judgment on that cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The cause of action of the defendant third-party plaintiff, City Underwriting Agency, Inc. (hereinafter City), for common-law indemnification was properly dismissed. The record demonstrates that City was not free of negligence because it issued insurance binders with incorrect information (see, Kagan v Jacobs, 260 AD2d 442; see also, Henderson v Waldbaums, 149 AD2d 461; County of Westchester v Becket Assocs., 102 AD2d 34, affd 66 NY2d 642). Krausman, J. P., Luciano, Feuerstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 370, 734 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edenwald-contracting-co-v-northern-insurance-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack