Edelstein v. South Post Officers Club

118 F. Supp. 40, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4424
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia
DecidedApril 25, 1951
DocketCiv. A. 567
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 118 F. Supp. 40 (Edelstein v. South Post Officers Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Edelstein v. South Post Officers Club, 118 F. Supp. 40, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4424 (E.D. Va. 1951).

Opinion

BRYAN, District Judge.

This action must be dismissed as a suit against an agency of the United States to which the United States has not consented. The South Post Officers Club is an instrumentality of the Government, formed as a necessary adjunct to, and an integral part of, the Military Establishment of the United States under the direction of the Secretary of War, now the Secretary of the Army, with Congressional authorization. It is wholly owned by the United States. Standard Oil Co. v. Johnson, 316 U.S. 481, 62 S.Ct. 1168, 86 L.Ed. 1611; Army Regulations No. 210-50 and No. 210-60. The United States has ■ not waived its sovereign immunity, of which its agency partakes, as to contract obligations of the Club.

Even if the complaint were amended to name the United States as defendant, under Title 28, § 1346, United States Code, the action could not be maintained, because contracts made by the Club are not obligations of the United States, but solely liabilities of the Club. AR 210-60 Sec. IV. 29. Indeed they are not claims against the United States. The plaintiff contracted with notice of the legal status of the Club, its immunity to suit, and the absence of responsibility of the United States.

The result is that the Club is obligated on its contract but cannot be sued, for its breach, and the United States is neither liable nor suable thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morales v. Senior Petty Officers' Mess
366 F. Supp. 1305 (D. Puerto Rico, 1973)
Swiff-Train Company v. United States
443 F.2d 1140 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Swiff-Train Co. v. United States
314 F. Supp. 665 (W.D. Texas, 1970)
Bowen v. Culotta
294 F. Supp. 183 (E.D. Virginia, 1968)
Walter H. E. Jaeger v. United States
394 F.2d 944 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
State ex rel. C. P. O. Mess v. Green
174 So. 2d 546 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)
Keetz v. United States
168 Ct. Cl. 205 (Court of Claims, 1964)
United States v. Cross
14 C.M.A. 660 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1964)
County of Culpeper, Virginia v. Etter
231 F. Supp. 999 (E.D. Virginia, 1963)
Bailey v. United States
201 F. Supp. 604 (D. Alaska, 1962)
Holcombe v. United States
176 F. Supp. 297 (E.D. Virginia, 1959)
Pulaski Cab Company v. United States
157 F. Supp. 955 (Court of Claims, 1958)
Alred v. Camp Irwin Non-Commissioned Officers' Open Mess
319 P.2d 654 (California Court of Appeal, 1958)
Brame v. GARNER
101 S.E.2d 292 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1957)
Daniels v. Chanute Air Force Base Exchange
127 F. Supp. 920 (E.D. Illinois, 1955)
Borden v. United States
116 F. Supp. 873 (Court of Claims, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 F. Supp. 40, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/edelstein-v-south-post-officers-club-vaed-1951.